Postare
lensmoso
Creator influent
RWA doesn’t really need more tokens.
The harder part is everything that comes after tokenization.
Who can own the asset?
Who can transfer it?
What happens across different jurisdictions?
How do you manage mint, burn, redemption, custody, and other permissions?
That’s what I find interesting about Injective Mint.
It’s not just about putting an asset onchain. It’s about bringing the rules governing that asset onchain as well.
Issuers can define eligible holders, jurisdiction restrictions, transfer permissions, freeze addresses, or pause an asset when necessary.
And once issued, these assets can potentially connect to trading, lending, derivatives, collateral, and settlement, depending on the legal structure and integrations.
Injective’s SEC-registered transfer agent is another interesting piece of the puzzle.
To me, the bigger direction looks like:
Tokenization → Rules → Recordkeeping → Settlement → Financial Markets
That’s much more interesting than simply putting real-world assets onchain.
Mint is still in private beta, so it’s too early to know how far this model can go.
But the direction is definitely worth watching @injective
Not financial advice.
Declinarea responsabilității: conținutul OKX Orbit este furnizat doar în scopuri informative. Aflați mai multe
Răspunsuri
Încă nu există niciun comentariu. Fiți primul care răspunde!
Mediatizate pe piață astăzi
1#NVIDIA discută cu CEO-ul Arm, Haas, previziuni interne pentru noul CEO
2#PPI-ul SUA din octombrie a crescut cu 6,5% față de anul precedent, sub așteptări
3#Anthropic lansează roadshow-ul IPO, evaluarea revine la 1,8 trilioane de dolari
